From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ero Properties, Inc. v. Cone

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 31, 1981
395 So. 2d 1264 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

Opinion

No. 80-1772.

March 31, 1981.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Thomas A. Testa, J.

William E. Shockett, Miami Beach, for appellant.

Cohen, Angel Rogovin and Terrence S. Schwartz, North Miami, for appellees.

Before DANIEL S. PEARSON and FERGUSON, JJ., and PEARSON, TILLMAN (Ret.), Associate Judge.


This appeal from a non-final order determining that Count IV of the complaint can be maintained as a class action, but reserving for later ruling the "nature and existence of the Plaintiff class," is dismissed upon a holding that the order appealed, unlike an order defining the class and its members, see Kohl v. Bay Colony Club Condominium, Inc., 385 So.2d 1028 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980), does not determine jurisdiction of the person and is not, therefore, nor otherwise, appealable under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130, see American Heritage Institutional Securities, Inc. v. Price, 379 So.2d 420 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980) (rejecting the defendant-appellant's apparently singular contention that a determination that the allegations of the complaint are sufficient to sustain a class action determines an issue of liability in favor of a party seeking affirmative relief and is thus an appealable non-final order).

Appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

Ero Properties, Inc. v. Cone

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 31, 1981
395 So. 2d 1264 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)
Case details for

Ero Properties, Inc. v. Cone

Case Details

Full title:ERO PROPERTIES, INC., A NEW YORK CORPORATION AUTHORIZED TO TRANSACT…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Mar 31, 1981

Citations

395 So. 2d 1264 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

Citing Cases

Hessen v. Metropolitan Dade County

This action was brought as a class action seeking a "declaration" that the redemption notice was inadequate,…

General Deve. Corp. v. Stanislaus

417 So.2d at 657. See National Lake Dev., 395 So.2d at 592, Ero Properties, Inc. v. Cone, 395 So.2d 1264…