From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Erbe v. Lincoln Rochester Trust Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 5, 1959
7 A.D.2d 963 (N.Y. App. Div. 1959)

Opinion

February 5, 1959

Appeal from the Monroe Special Term.

Present — McCurn, P.J., Williams, Bastow, Goldman and Halpern, JJ.


Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements and motion denied, without costs, without prejudice to the right to renew upon proper papers if defendants are so advised after completion of examinations to be had under the orders in the companion appeals and after plaintiffs have furnished an additional or supplemental bill of particulars, if so advised, or have had a reasonable time thereafter to do so. Memorandum: The order appealed from must be reversed without prejudice to the right to renew upon the conditions stated in our order herein. The order under review is much too broad and, in effect, disregards plaintiffs' compliance with certain items of the demand, in that it would require plaintiffs to furnish again some of the information demanded which has been furnished. Furthermore, an additional or supplemental bill of particulars, if furnished, would probably be more definite and positive after the completion of the examination before trial. All concur, Goldman, J., not participating.


Summaries of

Erbe v. Lincoln Rochester Trust Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 5, 1959
7 A.D.2d 963 (N.Y. App. Div. 1959)
Case details for

Erbe v. Lincoln Rochester Trust Co.

Case Details

Full title:GUSTAV ERBE, JR., et al., Individually and as Administrators C.T.A. of the…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 5, 1959

Citations

7 A.D.2d 963 (N.Y. App. Div. 1959)

Citing Cases

Stepps v. State of New York

The motion is required, it is alleged, to develop the answers required in the demanded bill of particulars. A…