concluding that "state law claims brought by health care providers against plan insurers too tenuously affect ERISA plans to be preempted by the Act."
Summary of this case from Davis v. United Healthcare Ins. Co.No. 94-1818.
October 16, 1995, October TERM, 1995.
C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 32 F. 3d 1529.
concluding that "state law claims brought by health care providers against plan insurers too tenuously affect ERISA plans to be preempted by the Act."
Summary of this case from Davis v. United Healthcare Ins. Co.Full title:EQUICOR, INC. v. LORDMANN ENTERPRISES, INC
Court:U.S.
Date published: Oct 16, 1995
Several superior court decisions have disallowed the defense of unclean hands in a mortgage foreclosure…
The Cadle Company v. GinsbergSee Cadle Co. v. Robert Ginsberg, supra 405-406; (Great Country's failure to disclose Nicotra settlement did…