From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

EQR–LPC Urban Renewal N. Pier, LLC v. City of Jersey City

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Nov 15, 2017
231 N.J. 157 (N.J. 2017)

Opinion

A–16 Sept. Term 2016 078268

11-15-2017

EQR–LPC URBAN RENEWAL NORTH PIER, LLC and EQR–Lincoln Urban Renewal Jersey City, LLC, Plaintiffs–Appellants, v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY, Defendant–Respondent.

Craig M. White (Baker & Hostetler of the Illinois bar, admitted pro hac vice, argued the cause for appellant (Baker & Hostetler and K & L Gates, attorneys; Craig M. White, Anthony P. La Rocco and Benjamin I. Rubinstein, on the brief). Jeremy A. Farrell and Philip S. Adelman argued the cause for respondent (Jeremy A. Farrell, Corporation Counsel, City of New Jersey, attorney; Mary Ann Murphy, Assistant Corporation counsel, on the brief).


Craig M. White (Baker & Hostetler of the Illinois bar, admitted pro hac vice, argued the cause for appellant (Baker & Hostetler and K & L Gates, attorneys; Craig M. White, Anthony P. La Rocco and Benjamin I. Rubinstein, on the brief).

Jeremy A. Farrell and Philip S. Adelman argued the cause for respondent (Jeremy A. Farrell, Corporation Counsel, City of New Jersey, attorney; Mary Ann Murphy, Assistant Corporation counsel, on the brief).

PER CURIAM

The judgment of the Superior Court, Appellate Division is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the PER CURIAM opinion, reported at 452 N.J. Super. 309, 173 A. 3d 243 (App. Div. 2016).

CHIEF JUSTICE RABNER and JUSTICES LaVECCHIA, ALBIN, PATTERSON, FERNANDEZ–VINA, and SOLOMON join in this opinion. JUSTICE TIMPONE did not participate.


Summaries of

EQR–LPC Urban Renewal N. Pier, LLC v. City of Jersey City

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Nov 15, 2017
231 N.J. 157 (N.J. 2017)
Case details for

EQR–LPC Urban Renewal N. Pier, LLC v. City of Jersey City

Case Details

Full title:EQR–LPC URBAN RENEWAL NORTH PIER, LLC and EQR–Lincoln Urban Renewal Jersey…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Nov 15, 2017

Citations

231 N.J. 157 (N.J. 2017)
173 A.3d 184

Citing Cases

P.H. v. E.M.

Div. 2016) (quoting Karl's Sales & Serv., Inc. v. Gimbel Bros, Inc., 249 N.J. Super. 487, 492 (App. Div.…

N.J. Div. of Child Prot. & Permanency v. A.L. (In re Au.L.)

The Supreme Court regularly decides appeals by adoption of either a majority or dissenting opinion. See,…