From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Enslein v. Hudson Manhattan R.R. Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 9, 1959
6 N.Y.2d 723 (N.Y. 1959)

Opinion

Argued February 25, 1959

Decided April 9, 1959

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, LOUIS L. FRIEDMAN, J.

Joseph Fennelly, Jr., William S. O'Connor and Gregory A. Lee for appellant.

William F. McNulty and Stanley D. Hicks for appellant-respondent.

Benjamin H. Siff and Abraham B. Fuss for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs to plaintiff against both defendants and with costs to defendant Hudson Manhattan Railroad Company against defendant, the Peelle Company. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge CONWAY and Judges DESMOND, DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS and BURKE.


Summaries of

Enslein v. Hudson Manhattan R.R. Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 9, 1959
6 N.Y.2d 723 (N.Y. 1959)
Case details for

Enslein v. Hudson Manhattan R.R. Co.

Case Details

Full title:META ENSLEIN, Respondent, v. HUDSON MANHATTAN RAILROAD COMPANY…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 9, 1959

Citations

6 N.Y.2d 723 (N.Y. 1959)
185 N.Y.S.2d 810
158 N.E.2d 504

Citing Cases

Gilbert v. Korvette's, Inc. et al

Domanyv. Otis Elevator Co., 369 F.2d 604 (6th Cir. 1966) (applying Ohio law); Vandagriff v. J.C. Penney Co.,…

Gilbert v. Korvette's Inc.

Given these record facts, this Court can only conclude, as have other courts which have examined similar…