In Eno v. Diefendorf (102 N.Y. 720) the answer did not allege that the six years had elapsed before the commencement of the action, and it was held bad.
Summary of this case from Bacon v. ChapmanArgued April 29, 1886
Decided June 1, 1886
S.N. Dada, for appellant.
F.A. Lyman for respondent.
Per Curiam mem. for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
In Eno v. Diefendorf (102 N.Y. 720) the answer did not allege that the six years had elapsed before the commencement of the action, and it was held bad.
Summary of this case from Bacon v. ChapmanFull title:MARIA ENO, Respondent, v . RUFUS DIEFENDORF, Impleaded, etc., Appellant
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Jun 1, 1886
The statute is not, therefore, sufficiently pleaded. Eno v. Diefendorf, 102 N.Y. 720. The addition of the…
Nickell v. TracyThere is no ambiguity as to what was intended by the pleader, and the facts relied upon are stated, and if…