From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Endicott v. Glynn County

Supreme Court of Georgia
Dec 2, 1975
221 S.E.2d 431 (Ga. 1975)

Opinion

30489.

SUBMITTED NOVEMBER 7, 1975.

DECIDED DECEMBER 2, 1975.

Obstruction of alley. Glynn Superior Court. Before Judge Knox.

Lucian J. Endicott, for appellants.

James A. Bishop, Q. Robert Henry, for appellees.


1. This appeal is from the denial of a motion to vacate an interlocutory order directing the appellant "... to remove an existing fence in an easement alley ..." Appellant in his brief states the fence has been removed. Therefore, issues raised here questioning the validity of the order are moot.

2. Appellant has served his sentence for contempt and issues as to the validity of that order are moot. Cagle v. PMC Development Co., 227 Ga. 309 ( 180 S.E.2d 545) (1971).

Appeal dismissed. All the Justices concur, except Hall, J., who concurs in the judgment only.


SUBMITTED NOVEMBER 7, 1975 — DECIDED DECEMBER 2, 1975.


Summaries of

Endicott v. Glynn County

Supreme Court of Georgia
Dec 2, 1975
221 S.E.2d 431 (Ga. 1975)
Case details for

Endicott v. Glynn County

Case Details

Full title:ENDICOTT et al. v. GLYNN COUNTY et al

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Dec 2, 1975

Citations

221 S.E.2d 431 (Ga. 1975)
235 Ga. 667

Citing Cases

Oak Creek Dev. v. Hartline-Thomas

Assuming an erroneous charge upon an implied contract and an implied promise to pay for additional work, the…

In re Kendall

Accordingly, the appeal regarding that adjudication is moot. See Endicott v. Glynn County, 235 Ga. 667(2) (…