From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ender v. Kehoe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 4, 1968
29 A.D.2d 1044 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)

Opinion

April 4, 1968

Appeal from the Monroe Trial Term.

Present — Bastow, J.P., Goldman, Del Vecchio, Marsh and Henry, JJ.


Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and facts and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. Memorandum: On a dark and rainy night plaintiff was struck by defendant's eastbound automobile while he was walking west on his left side of the highway pavement. He testified that he does not remember events after he started under a railroad bridge which was more than 60 feet east of where he was hit. "The burden of proof on the issue of contributory negligence is not shifted by plaintiff's loss of memory." ( Davis v. Rogers Fuel Corp., 284 App. Div. 1024, 1025; Karonis v. Palmietto, 281 App. Div. 687, affd. 305 N.Y. 898.) The finding implicit in the verdict that plaintiff complied with the provisions of section 1156 Veh. Traf. of the Vehicle and Traffic Law by moving as far to the left as was practicable upon the approach of defendant's vehicle is against the weight of the evidence.


Summaries of

Ender v. Kehoe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 4, 1968
29 A.D.2d 1044 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)
Case details for

Ender v. Kehoe

Case Details

Full title:JOHN ENDER, Respondent, v. ELLSWORTH A. KEHOE et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 4, 1968

Citations

29 A.D.2d 1044 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)

Citing Cases

Wartels v. County Asphalt

of was proper is supported by the following decisions sustaining dismissals of suits by amnesiac plaintiffs:…