From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Emulex Corp. v. Varjabedian

U.S. Supreme Court
Apr 23, 2019
139 S. Ct. 1407 (2019)

Opinion

No. 18-459

04-23-2019

EMULEX CORPORATION, et al., Petitioners v. Gary VARJABEDIAN, et al.

Shay Dvoretzky, Jeffrey R. Johnson, Jones Day, Gregory G. Garre, Benjamin W. Snyder, Samir Deger-Sen, Latham & Watkins LLP, Washington, DC, Annie M. Gowen, Latham & Watkins LLP, Chicago, IL, for Petitioners. Juan E. Monteverde, Miles D. Schreiner, Monteverde & Associates PC, New York, NY, Benjamin Heikali, Faruqi & Faruqi LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Daniel L. Geyser, Geyser P.C., Dallas, TX, for Respondents.


Shay Dvoretzky, Jeffrey R. Johnson, Jones Day, Gregory G. Garre, Benjamin W. Snyder, Samir Deger-Sen, Latham & Watkins LLP, Washington, DC, Annie M. Gowen, Latham & Watkins LLP, Chicago, IL, for Petitioners.

Juan E. Monteverde, Miles D. Schreiner, Monteverde & Associates PC, New York, NY, Benjamin Heikali, Faruqi & Faruqi LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Daniel L. Geyser, Geyser P.C., Dallas, TX, for Respondents.

Per Curiam.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Emulex Corp. v. Varjabedian

U.S. Supreme Court
Apr 23, 2019
139 S. Ct. 1407 (2019)
Case details for

Emulex Corp. v. Varjabedian

Case Details

Full title:Emulex Corp. v. Varjabedian

Court:U.S. Supreme Court

Date published: Apr 23, 2019

Citations

139 S. Ct. 1407 (2019)

Citing Cases

Jaroslawicz v. M&T Bank Corp.

Reconsideration of that interpretation is beyond our role, Bosse v. Oklahoma, 137 S. Ct. 1, 2 (2016), even if…