From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lo Presti v. Lo Presti

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 26, 1976
51 A.D.2d 578 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Opinion

January 26, 1976


In a habeas corpus proceeding pursuant to section 72 Dom. Rel. of the Domestic Relations Law to determine the visitation rights of the petitioner grandparents, petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Family Court, Orange County, dated September 5, 1975, which, after a hearing, inter alia dismissed the proceeding. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs, writ sustained, and matter remanded to the Family Court for further proceedings consistent herewith. Animosity between the mother of the children and their grandparents is not a proper basis for the denial of visitation privileges to the grandparents; nor is it a proper yardstick by which to measure the best interests of the children. Accordingly, the instant writ should have been sustained. We have remanded the matter to the Family Court to fix the visitation privileges of the grandparents. Gulotta, P.J., Latham, Margett, Damiani and Christ, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lo Presti v. Lo Presti

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 26, 1976
51 A.D.2d 578 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)
Case details for

Lo Presti v. Lo Presti

Case Details

Full title:EMIL LO PRESTI et al., Appellants, v. MARGARET LO PRESTI, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 26, 1976

Citations

51 A.D.2d 578 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Citing Cases

Matter of Vacula v. Blume

Order reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs or disbursements, writ sustained, and matter remanded…

Matter of Smith v. Jones

The credible evidence supports this trepidation. Of course, mere animosity between parent and grandparent is…