From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Emery v. Wynn Las Vegas, LLC

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Oct 24, 2014
No. 63570 (Nev. Oct. 24, 2014)

Opinion

No. 63570

10-24-2014

DIANA SUE EMERY, Appellant, v. WYNN LAS VEGAS, LLC, D/B/A WYNN LAS VEGAS, Respondent.


An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

On May 20, 2014, appellant Diana Sue Emery notified this court that she had filed a petition for relief under the Bankruptcy Code on May 17, 2014, in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Ohio. In light of this notice and the automatic bankruptcy stay, see 11 U.S.C. § 362(a)(1) (2012), this court suspended the briefing schedule in this appeal and directed Emery to file a status report regarding the bankruptcy proceeding and the automatic stay. On October 16, 2014, Emery filed her status report, indicating that the bankruptcy proceedings were still pending and that no efforts have been made to seek to modify the automatic stay.

Given the applicability of the automatic stay, this appeal may linger indefinitely on this court's docket pending final resolution of the bankruptcy proceedings. We therefore conclude that judicial efficiency will be best served if this appeal is dismissed without prejudice. Because a dismissal without prejudice will not require this court to reach the merits of this appeal and is not inconsistent with the primary purposes of the bankruptcy stay—to provide protection for debtors and creditors—such a dismissal will not violate the bankruptcy stay. See Dean v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 72 F.3d 754, 756 (9th Cir. 1995) (holding that a post-bankruptcy dismissal will violate the automatic stay "where the decision to dismiss first requires the court to consider other issues presented by or related to the underlying case"); IUFA v. Pan Am. World Airways, Inc., 966 F.2d 457, 459 (9th Cir. 1992) (holding that the automatic stay does not preclude dismissal of an appeal so long as dismissal is "consistent with the purpose of [11 U.S.C. § 362(a)(1)]"). Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed without prejudice to Emery's right to move for reinstatement within 90 days of either the lifting of the bankruptcy stay or final resolution of the bankruptcy proceeding.

It is so ORDERED.

/s/_________, J.

Pickering

/s/_________, J.

Parraguirre

/s/_________, J.

Saitta
cc: Hon. Valerie Adair, District Judge

Daniel J. Albregts, Ltd.

Lawrence J. Semenza, III, P.C.

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Emery v. Wynn Las Vegas, LLC

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Oct 24, 2014
No. 63570 (Nev. Oct. 24, 2014)
Case details for

Emery v. Wynn Las Vegas, LLC

Case Details

Full title:DIANA SUE EMERY, Appellant, v. WYNN LAS VEGAS, LLC, D/B/A WYNN LAS VEGAS…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Oct 24, 2014

Citations

No. 63570 (Nev. Oct. 24, 2014)