From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Emerson v. Borland

Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin
Oct 14, 1992
838 S.W.2d 951 (Tex. App. 1992)

Opinion

No. 3-92-237-CV.

October 14, 1992.

Appeal from 53rd Judicial District Court, Travis County, Paul R. Davis, Jr., J.

Dan Morales, Atty. Gen., Toni Hunter, Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, for appellants.

Scott Ozmun, Whitehurst, Harkness Watson, Austin, for appellee.

Before POWERS, ABOUSSIE and B.A. SMITH, JJ.


This is a suit for damages against five employees of the State Fire Marshall's Office arising out of the arrest of Scott Borland by the Trinity County Sheriff's Department in January 1986. Appellants, the employees, moved for summary judgment based on theories of quasi-judicial immunity to Borland's state-law claims and federal qualified immunity to Borland's federal claims. The trial court denied the motion for summary judgment. Appellants come before this Court pursuant to section 51.014(5) of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code, which permits appeal from an interlocutory order of a district court that denies a motion for summary judgment based on an assertion of immunity by an officer or employee of the state. Tex.Civ.Prac. Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014(5) (West Supp. 1992).

The Legislature amended section 51.014 in 1989 to permit appeal from an interlocutory order denying summary judgment based on an assertion of immunity. Section 2 of the 1989 amendatory act provides: "This Act applies only to suits first filed on or after the effective date of this Act." Act of June 14, 1989, 71st Leg., R.S., ch. 915, § 2, 1989 Tex.Gen.Laws 3946, 3947 (emphasis added). The effective date of the amendment was June 14, 1989. This suit was first filed on January 26, 1988, nearly 18 months before the effective date of section 51.014(5). Consequently, section 51.014(5) does not apply to this suit. We have no jurisdiction over an appeal from a trial court's interlocutory ruling unless such order is specifically made appealable by statute. Cherokee Water Co. v. Ross, 698 S.W.2d 363, 365 (Tex. 1985). Since section 51.014(5) is appellants' sole basis for invoking this Court's jurisdiction and it is inapplicable, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.


Summaries of

Emerson v. Borland

Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin
Oct 14, 1992
838 S.W.2d 951 (Tex. App. 1992)
Case details for

Emerson v. Borland

Case Details

Full title:Ernest EMERSON, Quay Wood, Brian McRae, Glenn Zoch and Lewis di Donato…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin

Date published: Oct 14, 1992

Citations

838 S.W.2d 951 (Tex. App. 1992)

Citing Cases

H C Comm. v. Reed's Food

An earlier amendment to section 51.014 was inapplicable to "suits first filed" before the effective date of…

Ex Parte Shumake

A court of appeals does not have jurisdiction to review interlocutory orders unless that jurisdiction has…