From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Elwood v. Sanders

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Eastern Division
May 31, 2007
2:06CV00224 WRW/BD (E.D. Ark. May. 31, 2007)

Opinion

2:06CV00224 WRW/BD.

May 31, 2007


ORDER


The Court has received the Recommended Disposition from Magistrate Judge Beth Deere. The parties have not filed any objections. After careful review of the Recommended Disposition, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted as this Court's findings in all respects in its entirety.

Accordingly, the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (# 1) is DENIED, and DISMISSED with prejudice. The Petitioner's Motion to Dismiss (#10) is GRANTED, the Motion to Compel (#14) is DENIED as moot, the Motion for Summary Judgment (#18) is DENIED, and the Motion for Expedited Disposition (#21) is DENIED as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Elwood v. Sanders

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Eastern Division
May 31, 2007
2:06CV00224 WRW/BD (E.D. Ark. May. 31, 2007)
Case details for

Elwood v. Sanders

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY R. ELWOOD Reg. #14620-045 PETITIONER v. LINDA SANDERS, Warden FCC…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Eastern Division

Date published: May 31, 2007

Citations

2:06CV00224 WRW/BD (E.D. Ark. May. 31, 2007)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Brown

Section 3613(b) currently provides that liability to pay terminates the later of 20 years from the entry of…

United States v. Stewart

United States v. Chorney, 453 F. App'x 4, 8 (1st Cir. 2011). Although Stewart may be able to bring his claim…