From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Elmgren v. Elmgren

Supreme Court of Rhode Island. PROVIDENCE
May 6, 1903
55 A. 322 (R.I. 1903)

Summary

In Elmgren v. Elmgren, 25 R.I. 177, decided in 1903, docketed as M.P. No. 2562, and heard by the Appellate Division, in full court, upon petition seeking to vacate a decree of divorce entered April 6, 1897, it was held that where a divorce was granted without notice to the wife as a result of a false affidavit of petitioner as to the residence of the wife, the wife not being implicated therein, the decree of divorce would be set aside as a fraud upon the court.

Summary of this case from Johnston v. Johnston

Opinion

May 6, 1903.

PRESENT: Stiness, C.J., Tillinghast and Douglas, JJ.

(1) Divorce. Vacating Judgment. Fraud. Where a divorce was granted as a result of a false affidavit of petitioner as to the residence of the wife, the wife not being implicated therein, the decree will be set aside as a fraud upon the court.

PETITION seeking to vacate a decree of divorce heretofore entered.

William A. Morgan, for petitioner.


The respondent filed a petition for divorce in this court June 6, 1896, to which he appended his affidavit that he had no information or belief as to the residence of his wife, now the petitioner, or where she could be found; that when he last heard of her she was at Hartford, Connecticut, and that he had written letters and made inquiries to find her.

Upon this affidavit notice was given by publication.

A decree of divorce was entered April 6, 1897.

It is now shown that the parties were married in Middletown, Connecticut; that he left her in that place about nine years ago, about two years before he filed his petition, and that his wife and children remained in the same house for about six years thereafter. He also had a brother living in the same place.

The court finds that the affidavit was false and a fraud upon the court. As held in State v. Watson, 20 R.I. 354, whenever a judgment, in divorce or other proceeding, is obtained by the fraud of the party in whose favor it is rendered, and the other party is not implicated therein, the judgment will be vacated.

The petition is granted, and the decree of divorce, entered April 6, 1897, upon the petition of said Andrew J. Elmgren, is set aside and declared void.


Summaries of

Elmgren v. Elmgren

Supreme Court of Rhode Island. PROVIDENCE
May 6, 1903
55 A. 322 (R.I. 1903)

In Elmgren v. Elmgren, 25 R.I. 177, decided in 1903, docketed as M.P. No. 2562, and heard by the Appellate Division, in full court, upon petition seeking to vacate a decree of divorce entered April 6, 1897, it was held that where a divorce was granted without notice to the wife as a result of a false affidavit of petitioner as to the residence of the wife, the wife not being implicated therein, the decree of divorce would be set aside as a fraud upon the court.

Summary of this case from Johnston v. Johnston
Case details for

Elmgren v. Elmgren

Case Details

Full title:EMMA B. ELMGREN vs. ANDREW J. ELMGREN

Court:Supreme Court of Rhode Island. PROVIDENCE

Date published: May 6, 1903

Citations

55 A. 322 (R.I. 1903)
55 A. 322

Citing Cases

Paine v. Paine

A petition to vacate has been entertained in other cases where it was alleged that the respondent did not…

Johnston v. Johnston

Under this section it has been the practice, since its enactment in 1902, to enter decision after hearing,…