From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Elliott v. Superintendent Donald Vaughn

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 23, 2006
Civil Action No. 1:04-CV-1101 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 23, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 1:04-CV-1101.

March 23, 2006


ORDER


AND NOW, this 23rd day of March 2006, upon consideration of plaintiff's motion for permission to appeal (Doc. 122) orders denying plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and for appointment of counsel (Doc. 122, p. 5), and it appearing that permission to appeal is not required, See FED. R. APP. P. 3(a), 5; 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291, 1292 (a)(1); FED. R. CIV. P. 54;see also, In re Diet Drugs Products Liability Litigation, 401 F.3d 143, 158 (3d Cir. 2005) (recognizing that the collateral order doctrine relaxes the strict standard of finality by permitting the appellate court to entertain appeals from certain orders that would not otherwise be appealable final decisions), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is DENIED without prejudice to plaintiff's right to file an appeal.


Summaries of

Elliott v. Superintendent Donald Vaughn

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 23, 2006
Civil Action No. 1:04-CV-1101 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 23, 2006)
Case details for

Elliott v. Superintendent Donald Vaughn

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH A. ELLIOTT, SR., Plaintiff, v. SUPERINTENDENT DONALD VAUGHN, et…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 23, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 1:04-CV-1101 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 23, 2006)