From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Elliott v. Shaw

Supreme Court of California
Oct 1, 1860
16 Cal. 377 (Cal. 1860)

Opinion

         Appeal from the Twelfth District.

         Suit against the drawer of a bill of exchange. Defendant appeals from the order denying the motion to set aside the judgment.

         Judgment affirmed.

         COUNSEL

          C. G. Fenner, for Appellant.

          H. H. Haight, for Respondent.


         JUDGES: Field, C. J. delivered the opinion of the Court. Baldwin, J. and Cope, J. concurring.

         OPINION

         FIELD, Judge

         Judgment in this case was entered by default, and the motion to open the same was denied. The excuse proffered by the defendant, in the affidavit upon which the motion was made, for his failure to plead--that he was under the impression, when he retained counsel in the case, that the time to answer had not expired; that he did not recollect the precise day upon which the summons and complaint were served; and that he was quite ill at the time, and did not as carefully note the time as he otherwise would have done--was entirely insufficient. It does not appear that his illness prevented him from attending to his business, or that it continued beyond the day. There is hardly a case where judgment of default has been entered, in which grounds equally forcible for opening the same might not be presented.

         Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

Elliott v. Shaw

Supreme Court of California
Oct 1, 1860
16 Cal. 377 (Cal. 1860)
Case details for

Elliott v. Shaw

Case Details

Full title:ELLIOTT v. SHAW et al.

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Oct 1, 1860

Citations

16 Cal. 377 (Cal. 1860)

Citing Cases

Horton v. New Pass Co.

Even excusable neglect must plainly appear to authorize the court to set aside judgment by default. ( Coleman…

Watson v. San Francisco & Humboldt Bay Railroad Co.

         COUNSEL          As to what constitutes a legal and sufficient excuse to avoid a judgment by…