From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Elliott Co. v. Montgomery

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION
Oct 26, 2016
Civil Action No. 15-02404 (W.D. La. Oct. 26, 2016)

Summary

finding that a plaintiff plausibly pleaded a LUPTA claim based on alleged CFAA violations

Summary of this case from Bureau Veritas Commodities & Trade, Inc. v. Nanoo

Opinion

Civil Action No. 15-02404

10-26-2016

Elliott Co. v. Montgomery


Magistrate Judge Carol B. Whitehurst JUDGMENT

For the reasons contained in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed previously herein, noting the absence objections thereto, and concurring with the Magistrate Judge's findings under the applicable law;

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion To Dismiss filed by the defendant, Tony Montgomery, [Rec. Doc. 21] is DENIED.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED in chambers, on this 26th day of October, 2016.

/s/_________

DEE D. DRELL, CHIEF JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Elliott Co. v. Montgomery

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION
Oct 26, 2016
Civil Action No. 15-02404 (W.D. La. Oct. 26, 2016)

finding that a plaintiff plausibly pleaded a LUPTA claim based on alleged CFAA violations

Summary of this case from Bureau Veritas Commodities & Trade, Inc. v. Nanoo
Case details for

Elliott Co. v. Montgomery

Case Details

Full title:Elliott Co. v. Montgomery

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION

Date published: Oct 26, 2016

Citations

Civil Action No. 15-02404 (W.D. La. Oct. 26, 2016)

Citing Cases

People Source Staffing Prof'ls LLC v. Robertson

As found in Elliott Co. v. Montgomery, No. CV 6:15-02404, 2016 WL 6301042, at *6 (W.D. La. Sept. 28, 2016),…

Bureau Veritas Commodities & Trade, Inc. v. Nanoo

Additionally, courts have found that the same conduct making up CFAA violations can be the basis for a LUPTA…