From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Elite Transit Sols. v. Cunningham

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 15, 2022
Civil Action 20-1549 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 15, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 20-1549

03-15-2022

ELITE TRANSIT SOLUTIONS, LLC., Plaintiff, v. ALPHONSO CUNNINGHAM, et. al., Defendants.


Maureen P. Kelly, Magistrate Judge

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Cathy Bissoon, United States District Judge

This case has been referred to United States Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), and Local Rule of Civil Procedure 72.

On December 6, 2021, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report (Doc. 90) recommending that Defendant Jilamy's Motion (Doc. 62) to dismiss be denied. Service of the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) was made on the parties, and Defendant Jilamy has filed Objections. (Doc. 91.)

After a de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the R&R and the Objections thereto, the following Order is entered:

Defendant Jilamy's Motion (Doc. 62) to dismiss is DENIED and the R&R (Doc. 90) is adopted as the Opinion of the District Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Elite Transit Sols. v. Cunningham

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 15, 2022
Civil Action 20-1549 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 15, 2022)
Case details for

Elite Transit Sols. v. Cunningham

Case Details

Full title:ELITE TRANSIT SOLUTIONS, LLC., Plaintiff, v. ALPHONSO CUNNINGHAM, et. al.…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 15, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 20-1549 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 15, 2022)

Citing Cases

Thru Tubing Sols. v. Robbins

See Doc. 1 (Compl.) ¶¶ 47-54. See also Elite Transit Solutions v. Cunningham, Civ. A. No. 20-1549, 2021 U.S.…