From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eli Lilly & Co. v. Sav-On-Drugs, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Mar 7, 1960
31 N.J. 591 (N.J. 1960)

Opinion

Argued February 22, 1960 —

Decided March 7, 1960.

On appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court, Chancery Division.

Mr. Melvin P. Antell argued the cause for the appellant ( Messrs. Lorentz Stamler, attorneys).

Mr. Warren E. Dunn argued the cause for the defendant-respondent ( Messrs. Lum, Fairlie Foster, attorneys; Mr. Claus Motulsky, of the New York bar, on the brief).

Mr. Murry Brochin argued the cause for the State of New Jersey, intervenor ( Mr. David D. Furman, attorney).


The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Scherer in the court below.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, and Justices BURLING, JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR and SCHETTINO — 6.

For reversal — Justice HALL — 1.


Summaries of

Eli Lilly & Co. v. Sav-On-Drugs, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Mar 7, 1960
31 N.J. 591 (N.J. 1960)
Case details for

Eli Lilly & Co. v. Sav-On-Drugs, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF INDIANA…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Mar 7, 1960

Citations

31 N.J. 591 (N.J. 1960)
158 A.2d 528

Citing Cases

Eli Lilly & Co. v. Sav-On-Drugs, Inc.

Pp. 276-284. 31 N.J. 591, 158 A.2d 528, affirmed. Everett I. Willis argued the cause for…

Walter E. Heller Company of Cal. v. Stephens

That these facts are not controlling is made evident by the cases cited above. For a recent discussion of…