From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Electric Company v. Paull

Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia
Jun 16, 1924
96 W. Va. 645 (W. Va. 1924)

Opinion

Submitted April 29, 1924.

Decided June 16, 1924.

Error to Circuit Court, Brooke County.

Action by the Brooke Electric Company against Mrs. Louise Paull. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

Reversed.

Ramsay Wilkin, Brown, Jackson Knight and Harold A. Ritz, for plaintiff in error.

P. J. McGinley, for defendant in error.


This is a proceeding by the Brooke Electric Company, a corporation, against the defendant, Mrs. Louise Paull, to condemn a right of way over a certain strip or parcel of land owned by the defendant, for the purpose of erecting and maintaining electric lines to be used for the purpose of conveying electric power.

The action of the lower court in refusing to allow the defendant to file her proper pleas and therefore not permitting her to offer any evidence in support of them was error and the case will be reversed, the exception to the commissioner's report sustained and the order permitting the applicant to take the property set aside and a new trial awarded.

Reversed.


Summaries of

Electric Company v. Paull

Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia
Jun 16, 1924
96 W. Va. 645 (W. Va. 1924)
Case details for

Electric Company v. Paull

Case Details

Full title:BROOKE ELECTRIC COMPANY v . MRS. LOUISE PAULL

Court:Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia

Date published: Jun 16, 1924

Citations

96 W. Va. 645 (W. Va. 1924)
123 S.E. 590

Citing Cases

Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. McCurdy

Instead, they remanded for a new trial. See Brooke Elec. Co. v. Paull , 96 W.Va. 645, 123 S.E. 590 (1924) ;…

Handley v. Cook

We do not mean to imply that anything for which a power or gas company seeks to condemn private property will…