From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eisel v. U.S. Slicing Mach. Co., Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Mar 20, 1980
412 A.2d 138 (Pa. 1980)

Opinion

Argued December 13, 1979.

Decided March 20, 1980.

Appeal No. 153 March Term, 1979, from the Order of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania at No. 652 April Term, 1978. Entered on July 6, 1979 which Affirmed the Order dated January 24, 1978 and the Judgment Entered on February 5, 1978 of Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, Civil Division at GD77-11433; Silvistri, Judge.

William R. Tighe, Jr., Stein Winters, Pittsburgh, for appellants.

Elmer G. Klaber, Pittsburgh, for appellee, East Carson Packing Co.

C. S. Fossee, Pittsburgh, for appellee, Gary Eisel.

Before EAGEN, C. J., and O'BRIEN, ROBERTS, NIX, LARSEN and FLAHERTY, JJ.


OPINION OF THE COURT


Gary Eisel filed a complaint in trespass against U.S. Slicing Machine Company, Inc., and Berkel, Inc. alleging that while in the course and scope of his employment with East Carson Packing Company (employer) he sustained serious personal injuries when he slipped and fell against a meat slicer manufactured by the defendants and sold by them to his employer. Berkel, Inc. filed a complaint to join the employer as additional defendant and the employer filed preliminary objections asserting that Section 303(b) of the Pennsylvania Workmen's Compensation Act, Act of December 5, 1974, P.L. 782, No. 263, § 6, 77 P. S. § 481(b) (Supp. 1979) barred such joinder. Berkel, Inc. filed a reply to the preliminary objections, claiming that Section 303(b) is unconstitutional. The Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County sustained employer's preliminary objections, and Berkel, Inc. appealed. The Superior Court (sitting as a panel of three judges) affirmed, ___ Pa.Super. ___, 407 A.2d 36 (1979), relying on its decision in Tsarnas v. Jones Laughlin Steel Corp., 262 Pa. Super. 417, 396 A.2d 1241 (1978). We granted allocatur and now affirm for the reasons set forth in our opinion filed this day in Tsarnas, supra, 488 Pa. 513, 412 A.2d 1094 (1980).

Order affirmed.

LARSEN, J., filed a concurring opinion.

NIX, J., concurred in the result.


I concur in the result for the reasons expressed in my concurring opinion in Tsarnas v. Jones Laughlin Steel Corporation, 488 Pa. 513, 412 A.2d 1094 (1980).


Summaries of

Eisel v. U.S. Slicing Mach. Co., Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Mar 20, 1980
412 A.2d 138 (Pa. 1980)
Case details for

Eisel v. U.S. Slicing Mach. Co., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Gary EISEL v. U.S. SLICING MACHINE COMPANY, INC. and Berkel, Incorporated…

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 20, 1980

Citations

412 A.2d 138 (Pa. 1980)
412 A.2d 138

Citing Cases

Luu Van Vu v. Clearfield Machine Co.

The constitutionality of Section 303 of the Workers' Compensation Act was neither raised nor considered in…

Lawless v. Central Engineering Co.

247 Pa.Super. at § 67-70, 372 A.2d at 870-71. The constitutionality of this provision was upheld by the…