From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Egressy v. Stansbury

Supreme Court of California,In Bank
Jul 2, 1906
149 Cal. 392 (Cal. 1906)

Opinion

L.A. No. 1873.

July 2, 1906.

MOTION to dismiss an appeal from the Superior Court of Los Angeles County.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Cole Cole, for Appellants.

L.M. Fall, for Respondents.


The motion of respondent to dismiss the appeal in the above entitled cause is granted. The time for the filing of the appellant's points and authorities expired long before the eighteenth day of April, 1906. No points and authorities had been filed up to the seventh day of May last, and on that day the motion to dismiss the appeal was filed in this court. The act of the governor in proclaiming legal holidays beginning with the 19th of April last could have no effect whatever upon the right of the appellant to file his points and authorities in a case such as this, where his time had expired before any holidays were proclaimed.


Summaries of

Egressy v. Stansbury

Supreme Court of California,In Bank
Jul 2, 1906
149 Cal. 392 (Cal. 1906)
Case details for

Egressy v. Stansbury

Case Details

Full title:S. EGRESSY et al., Appellants, v. CHARLES STANSBURY, and E.R. FOX…

Court:Supreme Court of California,In Bank

Date published: Jul 2, 1906

Citations

149 Cal. 392 (Cal. 1906)
86 P. 809

Citing Cases

Smith v. Smith

The legislative judgment in regard to the proper age at which such regulations shall become applicable to the…

Phillips v. Bd. of Police Commissioners

The examiner states that "A yardstick of one adult supervisor to each 50 teen-age dancers has been set forth…