From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Luce, Forward & Hamilton, & Scripps

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 7, 2003
319 F.3d 1091 (9th Cir. 2003)

Opinion

Nos. 00-57222, 01-55321, D.C. No. CV-00-01322-FMC.

Filed February 7, 2003.

Before: SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.


ORDER


Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

Judge Fisher was recused.


Summaries of

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Luce, Forward & Hamilton, & Scripps

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 7, 2003
319 F.3d 1091 (9th Cir. 2003)
Case details for

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Luce, Forward & Hamilton, & Scripps

Case Details

Full title:EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LUCE…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Feb 7, 2003

Citations

319 F.3d 1091 (9th Cir. 2003)

Citing Cases

Melton v. Philip Morris Inc.

Duffield' s continuing vitality is currently under attack. SeeEEOC v. Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps, 303…

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps

Id. Because of the importance of the issue, we agreed to rehear this case en banc. EEOC v. Luce, Forward…