From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Edwards v. Gaines Service Leasing Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 25, 1997
244 A.D.2d 279 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

November 25, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Janice Bowman, J.).


A car driven by defendant Mazzilli, travelling on a northbound entrance ramp to the Meadowbrook Parkway from the Southern State Parkway, swerved to avoid another car on the ramp, crossed a grassy divider, collided with the car in front of defendant Edwards' vehicle and then struck Edwards' vehicle, which was travelling in the right hand northbound lane of the Meadowbrook Parkway at approximately 45 to 50 miles per hour. The only issue on this appeal from the denial of Edwards' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is whether he was negligent in responding to Mazzilli's crossover. On that question, the IAS Court found a triable issue of fact. We discern no such issue and grant the motion.

The record shows that as the Mazzilli and Edwards vehicles reached the merge point of the Meadowbrook Parkway northbound and the entrance ramp from the Southern State Parkway, the Mazzilli car suddenly went out of control, crossed a narrow grass divider and struck two vehicles, including Edwards', in the northbound lanes of the Meadowbrook. According to Mazzilli, one second elapsed between the time of the first impact until his car came to rest. He described the interval of time from when he swerved left to avoid another car on the ramp to the time the car came to rest as "a second, second". According to the deposition testimony of Edwards' wife, when she first saw Mazzilli's car, she said, "Honey, that [Mazzilli] car is going to hit us." She continued, "I just about got it out of my mouth when it hit us." Since it is uncontested that the accident occurred just a second or two after Mazzilli's vehicle was first observed "coming across the grass, just a few feet from [Edwards' car]" and the parties opposing summary judgment have failed to identify what action, if any, Edwards could have taken to avoid the accident or minimize the damages, summary judgment is warranted under the emergency doctrine. ( See, Caban v. Vega, 226 A.D.2d 109.)

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Milonas, Wallach, Williams and Colabella, JJ.


Summaries of

Edwards v. Gaines Service Leasing Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 25, 1997
244 A.D.2d 279 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Edwards v. Gaines Service Leasing Corp.

Case Details

Full title:GERTRUDE EDWARDS et al., Plaintiffs, v. GAINES SERVICE LEASING CORP. et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 25, 1997

Citations

244 A.D.2d 279 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
664 N.Y.S.2d 445

Citing Cases

Wasserberger v. Somers Chase Taxi, Inc.

The opposing defendants "have failed to identify what action, if any [Mateer] could have taken to avoid the…

Rooney v. Madison

issue for trial unless there is sufficient evidence favoring the nonmoving party for a jury to return a…