From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Edwards v. F. W. Woolworth Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jul 1, 1942
27 A.2d 163 (Conn. 1942)

Summary

In Edwards v. Woolworth Co., 129 Conn. 245, 27 A.2d 163, while there was litter on the floor there was no evidence that anything other than a frankfurter skin would make it slippery.

Summary of this case from Morris v. King Cole Stores, Inc.

Opinion

Argued June 3, 1942

Decided July 1, 1942.

ACTION to recover damages for personal injuries, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant, brought to the Superior Court in Fairfield County and tried to the jury before Quinlan, J.; verdict for the plaintiff which the court, on defendant's motion, set aside, and from this decision the plaintiff appealed. No error.

Theodore I. Koskoff, for the appellant (plaintiff).

George N. Foster, with whom was C. David Munich, for the appellee (defendant).


The plaintiff brought this action to for injuries suffered when she slipped and fell a store of the defendant. She recovered a verdict the trial court set aside, and from that ruling she has appealed. In the store was a lunch counter and also a counter where frankfurters were sold. When the plaintiff entered about noon there was a crowd about the lunch counter. The floor was littered with broken cookies, a piece of bread, a broken, dirty roll and the like. She turned to enter an aisle of the store, and when she was about five feet from the place where the frankfurters were sold, she slipped and fell. After falling she looked around and saw a dry, dirty frankfurter skin on the floor which she claimed caused her fall. There was no evidence as to the length of time the skin had been on the floor, nor any evidence that anything else on it would make it slippery. We agree with the trial court that the jury could not reasonably have concluded that the skin had been on the floor in a position to cause danger to customers a sufficient length of time so that the defendant should in the exercise of a reasonable inspection have discovered it. Mascoela v. Wise, Smith Co., 120 Conn. 699, 181 A. 629; O'Brien v. H. L. Green Co., 128 Conn. 68, 20 A.2d 411.


Summaries of

Edwards v. F. W. Woolworth Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jul 1, 1942
27 A.2d 163 (Conn. 1942)

In Edwards v. Woolworth Co., 129 Conn. 245, 27 A.2d 163, while there was litter on the floor there was no evidence that anything other than a frankfurter skin would make it slippery.

Summary of this case from Morris v. King Cole Stores, Inc.

In Edwards v. F. W. Woolworth Co., 129 Conn. 245, 27 A.2d 163,164, there was a jury verdict for the plaintiff which the trial court set aside. From such decision plaintiff appealed, and the appellate court found no error. It said: "When the plaintiff entered about noon there was a crowd about the lunch counter.

Summary of this case from Boucher v. Paramount-Richards Theatres
Case details for

Edwards v. F. W. Woolworth Co.

Case Details

Full title:MARTHA EDWARDS v. F. W. WOOLWORTH COMPANY

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Jul 1, 1942

Citations

27 A.2d 163 (Conn. 1942)
27 A.2d 163

Citing Cases

Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Berry

The plaintiff cannot be said to have made out a case for the jury when it is necessary for the jury to…

Smeriglio v. Connecticut Savings Bank

The presence of debris on the top tread, which the plaintiff claimed he saw after his fall, cannot form the…