From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Edwards Co., Inc. v. Monogram Industries, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Sep 2, 1983
715 F.2d 157 (5th Cir. 1983)

Opinion

No. 82-2019.

September 2, 1983.

Larry D. Knippa, Houston, Tex., for plaintiff-appellant.

Dan Matthews, Houston, Tex., for Monogram Industries, Inc.

Charles L. Babcock, Dallas, Tex., for amicus curiae Nat. Realty Committee, Inc.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas; Walter Ely, J., sitting by designation.

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, BROWN, GEE, RUBIN, REAVLEY, POLITZ, RANDALL, TATE, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.


ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC [2] (Opinion March 21, 1983, 5 Cir., 1983, 700 F.2d 994)


A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.


Summaries of

Edwards Co., Inc. v. Monogram Industries, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Sep 2, 1983
715 F.2d 157 (5th Cir. 1983)
Case details for

Edwards Co., Inc. v. Monogram Industries, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:EDWARDS COMPANY, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. MONOGRAM INDUSTRIES, INC.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Sep 2, 1983

Citations

715 F.2d 157 (5th Cir. 1983)

Citing Cases

United States v. Jon-T Chemicals, Inc.

We cannot, as in the case of the Emperor's new clothes, pretend to see something which does not exist."…

Edwards Co., Inc. v. Monogram Industries, Inc.

A panel of this court reversed, 700 F.2d 994 (5th Cir. 1983), holding that where a "subsidiary has no real…