From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Edner v. Massachusetts Mut. Life Ins. Co.

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 13, 1945
59 F. Supp. 688 (W.D. Pa. 1945)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 2200.

March 13, 1945.

Kountz, Fry, Staley Meyer, of Pittsburgh, Pa., and L.D. McCall, of DuBois, Pa., for plaintiff.

Smith, Buchanan Ingersoll, Emery R. Kyle, and Wm. H. Eckert, all of Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendant.

P.K. Motheral and Reed, Smith, Shaw McClay, all of Pittsburgh, Pa., for third-party defendant.


Action by Merritt I. Edner, trustee in bankruptcy of George H. Lum, a bankrupt, against the Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company, wherein the defendant by interpleader proceedings brought in Jenny R. Mathews, executrix of the estate of George B. Mathews, deceased. On request for attorneys' fees and costs of Massachusetts Life Insurance Company.

Order in accordance with opinion.

See, also, 58 F. Supp. 486.


This is an interpleader case in which the Insurance Company undertook to relieve itself of a responsibility by paying into court the sum of $18,972.50, the cash surrender value of certain life insurance policies on the life of Lum, the bankrupt, when the full face value of the policies was $45,000. This court allowed the deposit to be made. The case was then appealed to the Circuit Court of Appeals of this Circuit; and that Court, holding that was not sufficient compliance with the Act, reversed the order of this Court allowing the deposit. See 138 F.2d 327. The Insurance Company then gave bond in compliance with the Interpleader Act, 28 U.S.C.A. § 41(26), and is now asking for the allowance of its costs in this case, as well as the premium which it paid on the bond it gave; i.e., $34.27, and the allowance of a reasonable attorneys' fee, which would include the services of its attorneys on the appeal to the Circuit Court of Appeals. The Insurance Company further asks that the allowance fixed constitute a lien on the policies of insurance. There is no fund now in Court, out of which we could order the payment of attorneys' fees and costs. But we are of the opinion that the Insurance Company is entitled to lien on the insurance policies for such costs and attorneys' fees as we may allow. See Stitzel-Weller Distillery v. Norman, D.C., 39 F. Supp. 182, 183.

We ordinarily allow an attorney fee of $150 in the insurance interpleader cases, and the costs. In this case, however, the Insurance Company is asking an allowance for fees of attorneys on the appeal to the Circuit Court of Appeals. We are of the opinion that it is not entitled to that, nor for the premium it paid on the bond. We accordingly fix the attorney-fee allowance at $150, and add to that the costs of plaintiff, including the service of process on the third-party defendant. An order is accordingly filed herewith.


Summaries of

Edner v. Massachusetts Mut. Life Ins. Co.

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 13, 1945
59 F. Supp. 688 (W.D. Pa. 1945)
Case details for

Edner v. Massachusetts Mut. Life Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:EDNER v. MASSACHUSETTS MUT. LIFE INS. CO. (MATHEWS, Third-Party Defendant)

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 13, 1945

Citations

59 F. Supp. 688 (W.D. Pa. 1945)

Citing Cases

Shrepic v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.

In this district counsel fees have been customarily allowed to the interpleader without contest. See…

John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Lloyd

There is objection to the amount of $250 requested for court costs and attorneys' fees to be paid by the…