From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Edmondson v. Alameda County

Supreme Court of California
Apr 1, 1864
24 Cal. 349 (Cal. 1864)

Opinion

         Appeal from the District Court, Third Judicial District, Alameda County.

         Defendant recovered judgment in the Court below, and plaintiff appealed.

         COUNSEL:

         N. Hamilton, for Appellant.

          W. W. Crane, Jr., for Respondent.


         JUDGES: Sawyer, J.

         OPINION

          SAWYER, Judge

         This cause was submitted, without oral argument, on the 4th of February. Each party had ten days in which to file briefs. No briefs or points are on file, and there is no assignment of errors in the record. This Court will not perform the duties of counsel; it will not examine a record to see if it can find any errors upon which to reverse a judgment. If the appellant's counsel does not choose, in some form, to call the attention of the Court to the points, provisions of the statute, and the authorities upon which he relies, the judgment will be affirmed.

         Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

Edmondson v. Alameda County

Supreme Court of California
Apr 1, 1864
24 Cal. 349 (Cal. 1864)
Case details for

Edmondson v. Alameda County

Case Details

Full title:POWHATTEN E. EDMONDSON v. ALAMEDA COUNTY

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Apr 1, 1864

Citations

24 Cal. 349 (Cal. 1864)

Citing Cases

Hutton v. Reed

If he makes no statement, it is not necessary that there should be in the transcript, or on file, what has…

Hickinbotham v. Monroe

          SAWYER, Judge          The time for filing briefs having expired three months ago, and none having…