From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Edgar v. Waldo

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 6, 1920
126 N.E. 906 (N.Y. 1920)

Opinion

Argued December 4, 1919

Decided January 6, 1920

George W. Wickersham and Thomas B. Gilchrist for appellant.

Francis M. Scott, Middleton S. Borland and Charles H. Edwards for plaintiffs, respondents.

Charles Howland Russell, Grenville T. Emmet, John F. Curran, Joseph H. Choate, Jr., Sinclair Hamilton, Charles E. Hotchkiss and Sydney G. Soons for defendants, respondents.

Charles D. Newton, Attorney-General ( Robert P. Beyer of counsel), for Attorney-General, respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., CHASE, COLLIN, HOGAN, McLAUGHLIN, CRANE and ANDREWS, JJ.


Summaries of

Edgar v. Waldo

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 6, 1920
126 N.E. 906 (N.Y. 1920)
Case details for

Edgar v. Waldo

Case Details

Full title:HERMAN L. EDGAR et al., Respondents, v . RHINELANDER WALDO, Appellant, and…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 6, 1920

Citations

126 N.E. 906 (N.Y. 1920)
126 N.E. 906

Citing Cases

Matter of Wollman

He, individually and as executor, and the other executors claimed exemption from taxation. That claim was…

Matter of Bouvier

A trust is not created by mere precatory provisions, unless at least it appears that the testator intended to…