From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eckert v. Truman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1913
158 App. Div. 939 (N.Y. App. Div. 1913)

Opinion

October, 1913.

Present — Jenks, P.J., Thomas, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ.


After entry of judgment the judgment debtor may appeal by another attorney without any substitution. ( Lusk v. Hastings, 1 Hill, 656; Cruikshank v. Goodwin, 20 N.Y. Supp. 757; Davis v. Solomon, 25 Misc. Rep. 695.) Mr. White's authority to represent Mrs. Truman in these proceedings had since the judgment, stands undisputed by Mr. Davenport, the former attorney of record. Plaintiff's motion to dismiss the appeal and to set aside the other proceedings taken in behalf of the appellant is denied, but without costs.


Summaries of

Eckert v. Truman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1913
158 App. Div. 939 (N.Y. App. Div. 1913)
Case details for

Eckert v. Truman

Case Details

Full title:Claudine Eckert, Respondent, v. Clara M. Truman, Appellant, and Another…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1913

Citations

158 App. Div. 939 (N.Y. App. Div. 1913)

Citing Cases

Shaw v. Manufacturers Hanover

The retainer agreement supplied by respondent speaks only of prosecuting or adjusting a claim for damages; no…

Gradl v. Saulpaugh

Order reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted,…