From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ecco High Frequency Corp. v. Commissioner

U.S.
Oct 11, 1948
335 U.S. 825 (1948)

Summary

finding individual coverage for employees involved in the construction of causeway linked to highway

Summary of this case from Meggs v. Condotte America, Inc.

Opinion

No. 175.

October 11, 1948.


C.A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Everett Frooks for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Caudle, Ellis N. Slack and Morton K. Rothschild for respondent. Reported below: 167 F. 2d 583.


Summaries of

Ecco High Frequency Corp. v. Commissioner

U.S.
Oct 11, 1948
335 U.S. 825 (1948)

finding individual coverage for employees involved in the construction of causeway linked to highway

Summary of this case from Meggs v. Condotte America, Inc.

concluding that if an issue is raised and decided against a party who fails to proffer a sufficient quantum of proof, the doctrine of collateral estoppel is binding just as if a “barrel” of evidence had actually been presented

Summary of this case from Kaler v. Kana (In re Kana)

concluding that if an issue is raised and decided against a party who fails to proffer a sufficient quantum of proof, the doctrine of collateral estoppel is binding just as if a "barrel" of evidence had actually been presented

Summary of this case from In re DEF Investments, Inc.
Case details for

Ecco High Frequency Corp. v. Commissioner

Case Details

Full title:ECCO HIGH FREQUENCY CORP. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 11, 1948

Citations

335 U.S. 825 (1948)

Citing Cases

William Whitman Co. v. Universal Oil Prod. Co.

This policy is primarily for the benefit of the public and not merely for the benefit of the litigants…

Williams v. Ocean Transport Lines, Inc.

Ocean Transport contends that because of the relationship of indemnitee-indemnitor between it and the Port…