From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eastman Kodak v. Photaz Imports

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
May 11, 1994
28 F.3d 102 (2d Cir. 1994)

Summary

finding allegations that defendant mailed catalogs and filled orders in the challenged district sufficient to establish venue

Summary of this case from D'Anton Jos, S.L. v. Doll Factory, Inc.

Opinion

No. 93-7917.

May 11, 1994.


W.D.N.Y. 853 F. Supp. 667.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Eastman Kodak v. Photaz Imports

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
May 11, 1994
28 F.3d 102 (2d Cir. 1994)

finding allegations that defendant mailed catalogs and filled orders in the challenged district sufficient to establish venue

Summary of this case from D'Anton Jos, S.L. v. Doll Factory, Inc.
Case details for

Eastman Kodak v. Photaz Imports

Case Details

Full title:Eastman Kodak Co. v. Photaz Imports Ltd., Inc

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: May 11, 1994

Citations

28 F.3d 102 (2d Cir. 1994)

Citing Cases

Capital District Physician's Health Plan v. O'Higgins

This court has previously identified three grounds for reconsideration: (1) an intervening change of…

Woodke v. Dahm

f" in state sustained personal jurisdiction as well as venue);Noxell Corp. v. Firehouse No. 1 Bar-B-Que…