From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Easterday v. Easterday

Supreme Court of Ohio
May 13, 1936
2 N.E.2d 8 (Ohio 1936)

Summary

In Easterday v. Easterday, 131 Ohio St. 165, 2 N.E.2d 8, it was held that there was no debatable constitutional question involved.

Summary of this case from State, ex Rel. v. Wanamaker

Opinion

No. 25937

Decided May 13, 1936.

Supreme Court — Dismissals — No debatable constitutional question involved — Court of Appeals — Jurisdiction to remand case with suggested way to cure error — Trial court's right to follow suggestion — Hearing — Overruling application for change of venue after judgment — Section 12000, General Code.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals of Clark county.

Messrs. Olinger Olinger, for appellant.

Mr. R. Stanley Lucas, for appellees.


It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

Appeal dismissed.

STEPHENSON, WILLIAMS, JONES, MATTHIAS, DAY and ZIMMERMAN, JJ., concur.

WEYGANDT, C.J., not participating.


Summaries of

Easterday v. Easterday

Supreme Court of Ohio
May 13, 1936
2 N.E.2d 8 (Ohio 1936)

In Easterday v. Easterday, 131 Ohio St. 165, 2 N.E.2d 8, it was held that there was no debatable constitutional question involved.

Summary of this case from State, ex Rel. v. Wanamaker
Case details for

Easterday v. Easterday

Case Details

Full title:EASTERDAY, APPELLANT v. EASTERDAY ET AL., APPELLEES

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: May 13, 1936

Citations

2 N.E.2d 8 (Ohio 1936)
2 N.E.2d 8

Citing Cases

State, ex Rel. v. Wanamaker

While the validity of Section 12000, General Code, was challenged in the case of Hedland v. Lones, Judge, 128…