From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

East Dayton Tool v. Pension Benefit

U.S.
Oct 3, 1994
513 U.S. 816 (1994)

Summary

holding that post-trial statements that juror believed that if the defendant had been innocent, he would have taken the stand, did not fall into the "narrow exception that arises when there is evidence of outside influences on the jury"

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Kelley

Opinion

No. 93-1945.

October 3, 1994, October TERM, 1994.


C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 14 F. 3d 1122.


Summaries of

East Dayton Tool v. Pension Benefit

U.S.
Oct 3, 1994
513 U.S. 816 (1994)

holding that post-trial statements that juror believed that if the defendant had been innocent, he would have taken the stand, did not fall into the "narrow exception that arises when there is evidence of outside influences on the jury"

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Kelley

holding that juror's post-trial affidavit alleging consideration of defendant's failure to testify is inadequate basis for new trial

Summary of this case from Spears v. Ryan

rejecting claim that fired law clerk had been"seized" when court officers removed him from judge's chambers and escorted him from courthouse

Summary of this case from O'Boyle v. Thrasher
Case details for

East Dayton Tool v. Pension Benefit

Case Details

Full title:EAST DAYTON TOOL DIE CO. ET AL. v. PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 3, 1994

Citations

513 U.S. 816 (1994)

Citing Cases

Chalif v. Spitzer

Although in their responsive pleadings the defendants have denied the vast majority of them, the underlying…

Bagola v. Kindt

The appellees argue that the Supreme Court's decision in Demko should end our inquiry and preclude a Bivens…