In East 96th Street v Santos, (2006 NY Slip Op 51980(U) [App Term, 1st Dept 2006]), the respondent-undertenant contended that the tenant permanently vacated in June 1995.
Summary of this case from 85 Fourth Partners, LP v. HerbertNo. 570205/06.
October 18, 2006.
Landlord and Tenant — Rent Regulation — Succession Rights.
In East 96th Street v Santos, (2006 NY Slip Op 51980(U) [App Term, 1st Dept 2006]), the respondent-undertenant contended that the tenant permanently vacated in June 1995.
Summary of this case from 85 Fourth Partners, LP v. HerbertFull title:East 96th St. Co., LLC v. Santos
Court:Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Date published: Oct 18, 2006
A record tenant who does not occupy the premises as a primary residence does not permanently vacate the…
CLINTON REALTY ASSOC. v. DE LOS ANGELESWhile respondent contends that the tenant of record — his wife, Melania — permanently vacated the apartment…