From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Easley v. Nixon-Hughes

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Jan 29, 2009
Case Number: 1:06cv863 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 29, 2009)

Summary

denying defendants' motion to dismiss on the grounds that the plaintiff's allegations that "he is being denied adequate treatment for his mental illness and is being punished for being mentally ill by being placed in a "23-1 hour isolation" cell with 'supermax' conditions" and that "mentally ill inmates are improperly mixed in with non-mentally ill inmates, and that untrained corrections officers are used to perform suicide watches and distribute mental health medications" stated a deliberate-indifference claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Summary of this case from Hamby v. Hall

Opinion

Case Number: 1:06cv863.

January 29, 2009


ORDER


This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Timothy S. Hogan. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and filed with this Court on September 30, 2008 a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 14). Subsequently, Defendants Nixon-Hughes, Huffman, Collins, Prise and Newsome filed objections to such Report and Recommendation (Doc 20).

The Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Recommendations should be adopted.

Accordingly, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 11) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Easley v. Nixon-Hughes

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Jan 29, 2009
Case Number: 1:06cv863 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 29, 2009)

denying defendants' motion to dismiss on the grounds that the plaintiff's allegations that "he is being denied adequate treatment for his mental illness and is being punished for being mentally ill by being placed in a "23-1 hour isolation" cell with 'supermax' conditions" and that "mentally ill inmates are improperly mixed in with non-mentally ill inmates, and that untrained corrections officers are used to perform suicide watches and distribute mental health medications" stated a deliberate-indifference claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Summary of this case from Hamby v. Hall

In Easley, the plaintiff alleged "that on one occasion he was placed on a suicide watch and attempted suicide while the officer assigned to monitor him slept.

Summary of this case from Finley v. Huss

In Easley v. Nixon-Hughes, 2009 WL 237733 (S.D. Ohio, Jan. 29, 2009), a prisoner claimed that he was mentally ill and had attempted suicide on several occasions.

Summary of this case from Finley v. Huss
Case details for

Easley v. Nixon-Hughes

Case Details

Full title:DAVID EASLEY, Plaintiff(s), v. DEBORAH NIXON-HUGHES, et. al., Defendant(s)

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Jan 29, 2009

Citations

Case Number: 1:06cv863 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 29, 2009)

Citing Cases

Nelson v. Parker

The plaintiff's allegations about the lack of cleanliness in his unit, combined with the fact that the…

Hamby v. Hall

d no bedding; that suicidal inmates do not get mental health treatment other than isolation in a suicide…