From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Earle v. Rice

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 3, 1940
259 App. Div. 1014 (N.Y. App. Div. 1940)

Opinion

June 3, 1940.


Order denying the defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to subdivision 4 of rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice on the ground that there is another action pending between the same parties for the same cause, reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with ten dollars costs, without prejudice, however, to a new action in the event that the Surrogate's Court finally determines that it is without jurisdiction of the subject-matter of the proceeding there pending. We are of opinion that the Surrogate's Court, in the discovery proceeding instituted by the plaintiff and now pending in the Surrogate's Court of New York County, has competent jurisdiction to afford the plaintiff adequate relief, legal and equitable, and finally to dispose of all the issues between the parties presented by the complaint, and that that proceeding is a bar to this action. Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Earle v. Rice

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 3, 1940
259 App. Div. 1014 (N.Y. App. Div. 1940)
Case details for

Earle v. Rice

Case Details

Full title:MILDRED EARLE, as Executrix, etc., of BELLA WALLERSTEIN, Also Known as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 3, 1940

Citations

259 App. Div. 1014 (N.Y. App. Div. 1940)

Citing Cases

Woods v. Fifth-Third Union Tr. Co.

In New York Trust Co. v. Island Oil Transport Co., 34 F. (2d.), 655, the court at pages 655 and 656 said:…

Weinstein v. Newman

In holding that under the circumstances there was no intent to contract, we quoted from New York Trust Co. v.…