From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eagle Jet Aviation Inc. v. Woods

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Jun 27, 2017
403 P.3d 684 (Nev. 2017)

Summary

denying motion to vacate arbitration based on claim that arbitrators punished plaintiff for alleged "discovery abuse" while allowing the defendant's allegedly "much greater discovery abuse" to go unpunished

Summary of this case from Jay Hu v. Regal Sec., Inc.

Opinion

No. 69873

06-27-2017

EAGLE JET AVIATION INC., a Nevada corporation; and Alex Penly, Appellants, v. Milton WOODS; and Cirrus Aviation Services Inc., a Washington corporation, Respondents.

Law Offices of Mark C. Fields, APC Fox Rothschild, LLP


AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Eagle Jet Aviation Inc. v. Woods

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Jun 27, 2017
403 P.3d 684 (Nev. 2017)

denying motion to vacate arbitration based on claim that arbitrators punished plaintiff for alleged "discovery abuse" while allowing the defendant's allegedly "much greater discovery abuse" to go unpunished

Summary of this case from Jay Hu v. Regal Sec., Inc.
Case details for

Eagle Jet Aviation Inc. v. Woods

Case Details

Full title:EAGLE JET AVIATION INC., a Nevada corporation; and Alex Penly, Appellants…

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada.

Date published: Jun 27, 2017

Citations

403 P.3d 684 (Nev. 2017)

Citing Cases

Jay Hu v. Regal Sec., Inc.

Even if the Court were to review the evidentiary rulings, however, the Court would deny Hu's motion: because…