Opinion
Argued June 20, 1894
Decided October 9, 1894
William Spargur for appellants.
Charles H. Brown for respondent.
EARL, J., reads for affirmance.
All concur, except ANDREWS, Ch. J., not sitting.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Dyke v. Spargur
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 9, 1894
38 N.E. 269 (N.Y. 1894)
Summaries of
Dyke v. Spargur
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 9, 1894
38 N.E. 269 (N.Y. 1894)
Case details for
Dyke v. Spargur
Case Details
Full title:ELECTA A. DYKE, Respondent, v . WILLIAM SPARGUR et al., Appellants
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Oct 9, 1894
Citations
38 N.E. 269 (N.Y. 1894)
38 N.E. 269
62 N.Y. St. Rptr. 529
Citing Cases
Town of Babylon v. Darling
Moreover, undisputed facts may be considered for the purpose of upholding the judgment. ( Dyke v. Spargur,…
Schick v. WolfIf Cyrus entered peaceably under his contract, the equitable title he asserts might have protected him, if…