From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dyer v. Rosenberg

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 25, 1970
434 F.2d 648 (9th Cir. 1970)

Opinion

No. 25259.

November 25, 1970.

Maurice R. Dyer, in propria persona, for petitioner-appellant.

No appearance for defendant-appellee.

Before BROWNING, DUNIWAY and TRASK, Circuit Judges.


Dyer retained Rosenberg, an attorney, to defend him in a California criminal prosecution. Dyer was convicted and appealed. He alleges that his appeal was dismissed because Rosenberg failed to file an opening brief on appeal. The District Court dismissed for want of jurisdiction, and we affirm.

Dyer rests jurisdiction on 28 U.S.C. § 1343, which confers jurisdiction of actions for violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1871, 42 U.S.C. § 1983. That section does not apply here. Rosenberg was not acting "under color of" state law. Kregger v. Posner, E.D.Mich. 1966, 248 F. Supp. 804, 806. See also Mulligan v. Schlachter, 6 Cir., 1968, 389 F.2d 231, 233, where the defendant had been the plaintiff's court-appointed counsel in the state case.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Dyer v. Rosenberg

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 25, 1970
434 F.2d 648 (9th Cir. 1970)
Case details for

Dyer v. Rosenberg

Case Details

Full title:Maurice R. DYER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Bert M. ROSENBERG…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Nov 25, 1970

Citations

434 F.2d 648 (9th Cir. 1970)

Citing Cases

United States ex Rel. Simmons v. Zibilich

Facing this question, the First, Third, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth, and Ninth Circuits have held that a…

Szijarto v. Legeman

But this Circuit, in common with others, has held that such a claim is not within the purview of the Civil…