From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dye v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION
Aug 26, 2013
1:12-cv-593- SEB-TAB (S.D. Ind. Aug. 26, 2013)

Opinion

1:12-cv-593- SEB-TAB

08-26-2013

TAMMY R. DYE, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Court, having reviewed the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation at Docket No. 28 and observing that no party objected to it within the time permitted under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), finds said Report and Recommendation is sound and well-reasoned and adopts it as the ruling of this Court.

Accordingly, the Commissioner's decision denying Plaintiff's application for Social Security Supplemental Income is AFFIRMED.

______________________

SARAH EVANS BARKER, JUDGE

United States District Court

Southern District of Indiana
Copies to: Thomas E. Kieper
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
tom.kieper@usdoj.gov
Patrick Harold Mulvany
patrick@mulvanylaw.com


Summaries of

Dye v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION
Aug 26, 2013
1:12-cv-593- SEB-TAB (S.D. Ind. Aug. 26, 2013)
Case details for

Dye v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:TAMMY R. DYE, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of the…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

Date published: Aug 26, 2013

Citations

1:12-cv-593- SEB-TAB (S.D. Ind. Aug. 26, 2013)

Citing Cases

Miller v. Colvin

Miller's counsel should not have to be constantly reminded of his obligation to accurately present the facts…