From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Durham v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jun 22, 1989
383 S.E.2d 654 (Ga. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

A89A0891.

DECIDED JUNE 22, 1989.

Criminal solicitation to commit murder. Spalding Superior Court. Before Judge Miller.

The Garland Firm, Donald F. Samuel, for appellant.

W. Fletcher Sams, District Attorney, J. David Fowler, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.


Ronnie Benjamin Durham was convicted of criminal solicitation to commit murder, and he filed this appeal.

Appellant's sole enumeration of error is that the trial court erred by failing to charge, absent a request, that once appellant established a prima facie case of coercion, the State had the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that appellant was not coerced into committing the charged crime. We do not agree. The record reveals that the trial court gave a thorough charge on the definition of coercion, which was taken verbatim from the request to charge appellant did file. The court also charged the jury on the presumption of innocence and the State's burden of proof as to each element of the crime, and stated further that appellant had "no burden of proof, nor burden of persuasion in this case whatsoever." Taken as a whole the court's charge fully and fairly presented appellant's case and theories to the jury. See Mallory v. State, 166 Ga. App. 812, 814-815 (3) ( 305 S.E.2d 656) (1983). Contrary to appellant's contentions, this is not a case in which "`the [enumerated] omission is clearly harmful and erroneous as a matter of law in that it fails to provide the jury with the proper guidelines for determining guilt or innocence, (cits.)' [cits.]" Laney v. State, 184 Ga. App. 463, 467 ( 361 S.E.2d 841) (1987), and thus appellant is not relieved from the necessity of requesting an instruction at trial as a prerequisite to challenging its omission on appeal. Compare id. at 466-467 (2). Accordingly, we find no merit in appellant's appeal. See generally Mallory, supra at 815.

Judgment affirmed. Banke, P. J., and Pope, J., concur.

DECIDED JUNE 22, 1989.


Summaries of

Durham v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jun 22, 1989
383 S.E.2d 654 (Ga. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

Durham v. State

Case Details

Full title:DURHAM v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Jun 22, 1989

Citations

383 S.E.2d 654 (Ga. Ct. App. 1989)
383 S.E.2d 654

Citing Cases

White v. State

In any event, mere presence is not a recognized defense, only a "`corollary to the requirement that the state…