From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Duran v. Reno

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Oct 25, 1999
197 F.3d 63 (2d Cir. 1999)

Summary

vacating prior opinion as moot because appellant was deported prior to issuance

Summary of this case from Versata Software, Inc. v. Callidus Software, Inc.

Opinion

No. 98-2715

October 25, 1999

Present: HONORABLE RALPH K. WINTER, Chief Judge, JANE A. RESTANI, Judge, MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, District Judge,

The Honorable Jane A. Restani, of the United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation.

The Honorable Michael B. Mukasey, of the United States District Court for the Southern district of New York, sitting by designation.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(b) and an order of the Chief Judge of this Court certifying a judicial emergency, this case was heard by a panel consisting of the Chief Judge of this Court, one judge of the United States District Court sitting by designation, and one judge of the United States Court of International Trade sitting by designation.


In an opinion dated September 20, 1999, we granted appellant's motion for the appointment of counsel on appeal from the district court's (Griesa, Chief Judge) dismissal of appellant's habeas corpus petition, and ordered that counsel shall be appointed pursuant to the Criminal Justice Act ("CJA"), 18 U.S.C. § 3006A. See Duran v. Reno, 193 F.3d 82, 83-84 (2d. Cir. 1999). The government thereafter moved to modify that portion of the opinion appointing counsel under the CJA. The government now informs us, however, that appellant was deported from the United States on February 23, 1999 and that no stay of deportation was in effect at the time appellant was deported. We thus have no jurisdiction over appellant's appeal. Accordingly, it is ordered that said appeal be and it hereby is dismissed, and the September 20, 1999 opinion is vacated as moot.


Summaries of

Duran v. Reno

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Oct 25, 1999
197 F.3d 63 (2d Cir. 1999)

vacating prior opinion as moot because appellant was deported prior to issuance

Summary of this case from Versata Software, Inc. v. Callidus Software, Inc.

dismissing habeas petition filed by deported alien subject to INA Section 106 as moot

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Copeland

In Duran v. Reno, 197 F.3d 63, 63 (2d Cir. 1999), a terse opinion, we did dismiss an immigration appeal as "moot" based on the appellant's deportation.

Summary of this case from Swaby v. Ashcroft
Case details for

Duran v. Reno

Case Details

Full title:ALBERTO DURAN, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. JANET RENO, ET AL.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Oct 25, 1999

Citations

197 F.3d 63 (2d Cir. 1999)

Citing Cases

Versata Software, Inc. v. Callidus Software, Inc.

Accordingly, when an appeal is moot before issuance of the appellate court's opinion, it is appropriate to…

U.S. v. Copeland

Thus, Copeland was statutorily barred from filing a habeas petition after he was deported. See Swaby v.…