From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dunn v. Dunn

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Jan 12, 1943
29 A.2d 664 (Md. 1943)

Opinion

[Nos. 66-68, October Term, 1942.]

Decided January 12, 1943.

Divorce — Adultery — Evidence — Wife's Counsel Fees.

Decided January 12, 1943.

Appeal from the Circuit Court No. 2 of Baltimore City (O'DUNNE and DICKERSON, JJ.).

Suit for divorce by Walter K. Dunn against Mary Margaret Dunn, wherein defendant filed a cross-bill for an injunction and other relief against the plaintiff and the Calvert Bank. From a decree dismissing the original bill and cross-bill, Walter K. Dunn and Mary Margaret Dunn separately appeal. From an order after the decree directing Walter K. Dunn to pay a counsel fee and alimony pendente lite, Walter K. Dunn appeals.

Decree reversed in part and affirmed in part and cause remanded. Order affirmed.

The cause was argued before SLOAN, JOHNSON, DELAPLAINE, COLLINS, MARBURY, and GRASON, JJ.

Hewlett B. Cox, with whom was S. Alfred Mund and Charles J. Stinchcomb on the brief, for Walter K. Dunn.

Murray MacNabb, with whom was Hartwell M. King on the brief, for Mary Margaret Dunn.


Unreported cases.


Summaries of

Dunn v. Dunn

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Jan 12, 1943
29 A.2d 664 (Md. 1943)
Case details for

Dunn v. Dunn

Case Details

Full title:WALTER K. DUNN v . MARY HOWARD DUNN (Two cases) MARY HOWARD DUNN v …

Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland

Date published: Jan 12, 1943

Citations

29 A.2d 664 (Md. 1943)
29 A.2d 664

Citing Cases

Saltzgaver v. Saltzgaver

question in Maryland. It is summarized in these words in the case of Daiger v. Daiger, supra ( 154 Md. 501,…