From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dunlap v. Dunlap

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 21, 1970
34 A.D.2d 890 (N.Y. App. Div. 1970)

Opinion

May 21, 1970

Appeal from the Monroe Special Term.

Present — Goldman, P.J., Marsh, Witmer, Moule and Henry, JJ.


Order unanimously modified in accordance with the Memorandum herein, and as so modified affirmed, with costs to respondent. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order of Monroe Special Term which directed him to pay counsel fees to plaintiff's attorney and to give security for costs. The order for payment of counsel fees to plaintiff's attorney was properly made ( Zerille v. Zerille, 46 Misc.2d 806), but the order should be modified by deleting therefrom the provisions requiring defendant to give security for costs. In our opinion the provisions of CPLR 8501 requiring nonresident plaintiffs to give such security do not apply to a nonresident defendant who has interposed a counterclaim. ( Turmelle v. Jefferson, 166 Misc. 70.) The order should be modified by deleting the first, third, and fourth ordering paragraphs thereof.


Summaries of

Dunlap v. Dunlap

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 21, 1970
34 A.D.2d 890 (N.Y. App. Div. 1970)
Case details for

Dunlap v. Dunlap

Case Details

Full title:BETTY L. DUNLAP, Respondent, v. CHARLES DUNLAP, Appellant. Appeal No. 3

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 21, 1970

Citations

34 A.D.2d 890 (N.Y. App. Div. 1970)

Citing Cases

Nawaz v. Bloom Residential, LLC

The statute's plain language thus indicates D.C. Code § 15-703(a) does not apply to counterclaim plaintiffs.…