From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Duncan v. Ratcliff

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Dec 26, 1916
161 P. 1174 (Okla. 1916)

Opinion

No. 6811

Opinion Filed December 26, 1916.

Error from District Court, Alfalfa County; James W. Steen, Judge.

Action between Hank Duncan and others and Lillian Ratcliff. There was a judgment for the latter, and the former bring error. Dismissed.

W. Wilder, for plaintiffs in error.

Titus Talbot, for defendant in error.


From the motion to dismiss filed herein by defendant in error, attached to which is the affidavit of the clerk of the district court, it appears that the judgment from which this appeal is prosecuted has been fully satisfied and discharged. Hence the questions presented here have ceased to exist and have become moot.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.


Summaries of

Duncan v. Ratcliff

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Dec 26, 1916
161 P. 1174 (Okla. 1916)
Case details for

Duncan v. Ratcliff

Case Details

Full title:DUNCAN et al. v. RATCLIFF

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Dec 26, 1916

Citations

161 P. 1174 (Okla. 1916)
63 Okla. 19

Citing Cases

Grand River Dam Authority v. Eaton

It is note in Guin that no supersedeas bond was procured and no discussion is had in the opinion as to…

Wallace v. Boston Mutual Life Ins. Co.

"Where, pending an appeal, a satisfaction of judgment is filed in the trial court, the proceedings in the…