From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dumay v. Dumay

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1926
217 A.D. 773 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)

Summary

In Dumay v. Dumay (217 App. Div. 773) the Appellate Division, Second Department, enforced an order against a divorced husband for the payment of medical expenses disbursed by his former wife for the support of their child.

Summary of this case from Karminski v. Karminski

Opinion

June, 1926.


Order denying motion that defendant be required to reimburse plaintiff for medical expenses reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. The decree of divorce, while it dissolved the marital relations of the parties, did not absolve the defendant of the duty that the law imposes upon him as the father of the child. "The husband did not divorce his child, or dissolve his liabilities to it. * * * The child is entitled to the support and maintenance by its father. If the father fails to support his child and furnish the necessaries to keep it alive, that is, fail and refuse to give it a home, food and clothing, education and medical attendance, these may be furnished by others, even a stranger to the family, and he will be held liable for it." ( Laumeier v. Laumeier, 237 N.Y. 357, 364. See, also, Ehrich v. Ehrich, 211 App. Div. 490; De Brauwere v. De Brauwere, 203 N.Y. 460.) Kelly, P.J., Rich, Manning, Kapper and Lazansky, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Dumay v. Dumay

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1926
217 A.D. 773 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)

In Dumay v. Dumay (217 App. Div. 773) the Appellate Division, Second Department, enforced an order against a divorced husband for the payment of medical expenses disbursed by his former wife for the support of their child.

Summary of this case from Karminski v. Karminski

In Dumay v. Dumay (217 A.D. 773) the Appellate Division in the Second Department held that a divorce decree did not absolve a father of his duty of furnishing necessaries for his child, and that the mother was entitled to be reimbursed for moneys expended for medical care of a child.

Summary of this case from Ebstein v. Saxen
Case details for

Dumay v. Dumay

Case Details

Full title:SYLVIA DUMAY, Appellant, v. CHARLES DUMAY, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1926

Citations

217 A.D. 773 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)

Citing Cases

Morris v. Birmingham

The court upheld the right of the mother to sue for a sum expended for necessaries for the support of the…

Manice v. Randolph

The ruling of Rich v. Rich (88 Hun, 566), upon which the lower court ( 129 Misc. 172) based its decision, is…