From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dukes v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 4, 1982
90 A.D.2d 708 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Summary

In Dukes, the first case to depart from New York's traditional rule, Supreme Court distinguished the prior decisions, stating that "[w]hile earlier cases in New York contained different language [than 11 NYCRR 60.1 (b)] and reached different results * * * the prevailing authority throughout the country today permits recovery of all interest regardless of the policy limits" (Sup Ct, N.Y. County, Jan. 5, 1982, Tyler, J., slip opn, at 5 [citations omitted]).

Summary of this case from Shnarch v. Empire Mutual Insurance Company

Opinion

November 4, 1982


Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (A.R. Tyler, J.), entered on March 2, 1982, unanimously affirmed. Respondent shall recover of appellants $75 costs and disbursements of this appeal. The appeal from the order of said court entered on March 2, 1982, is dismissed as having been subsumed in the appeal from the judgment, without costs and without disbursements. No opinion.

Concur — Ross, J.P., Carro, Asch and Silverman, JJ.


Summaries of

Dukes v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 4, 1982
90 A.D.2d 708 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

In Dukes, the first case to depart from New York's traditional rule, Supreme Court distinguished the prior decisions, stating that "[w]hile earlier cases in New York contained different language [than 11 NYCRR 60.1 (b)] and reached different results * * * the prevailing authority throughout the country today permits recovery of all interest regardless of the policy limits" (Sup Ct, N.Y. County, Jan. 5, 1982, Tyler, J., slip opn, at 5 [citations omitted]).

Summary of this case from Shnarch v. Empire Mutual Insurance Company
Case details for

Dukes v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.

Case Details

Full title:CHERYL DUKES, Respondent, v. ROYAL GLOBE INSURANCE Co. et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 4, 1982

Citations

90 A.D.2d 708 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Citing Cases

Shnarch v. Empire Mutual Insurance Company

In New York, the long-standing interpretation of such a policy clause has required insurance carriers to pay…

Rodriguez v. Rodriguez

This rule conforms to the practice in a majority of the other 49 States (cf. 8A Appleman, Insurance Law and…