From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Duke v. Marshall Co., Inc.

U.S.
Feb 23, 1998
522 U.S. 1112 (1998)

Summary

holding that the Double Jeopardy Clause protects against being twice tried or placed in jeopardy, not just twice punished, federal adjudication of such claims on a pre-trial basis is appropriate

Summary of this case from Doriott v. Court of Common Pleas of Warren County

Opinion

No. 97-972.

February 23, 1998, OCTOBER TERM, 1997.


C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 114 F. 3d 188.


Summaries of

Duke v. Marshall Co., Inc.

U.S.
Feb 23, 1998
522 U.S. 1112 (1998)

holding that the Double Jeopardy Clause protects against being twice tried or placed in jeopardy, not just twice punished, federal adjudication of such claims on a pre-trial basis is appropriate

Summary of this case from Doriott v. Court of Common Pleas of Warren County

analyzing possible duty to accommodate paraplegic firefighter by assignment to specialized bureau

Summary of this case from Mazza v. Bratton
Case details for

Duke v. Marshall Co., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:DUKE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEE FOR STRICKLAND, ET AL. v. MARSHALL CO.…

Court:U.S.

Date published: Feb 23, 1998

Citations

522 U.S. 1112 (1998)

Citing Cases

Ross v. Petro

Ground C: To the extent, if any, that the Ninth Appellate District successfully articulated the correct rules…

In re Wright

" A defalcation is defined as "the misappropriation of trust funds or money held in any fiduciary capacity…