From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Duke v. Astrue

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Aug 3, 2010
Case No. 3:09cv412/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Aug. 3, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 3:09cv412/MCR/EMT.

August 3, 2010


ORDER


This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated July 16, 2010. (Doc. 15). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED, this action is DISMISSED, and the clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Duke v. Astrue

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Aug 3, 2010
Case No. 3:09cv412/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Aug. 3, 2010)
Case details for

Duke v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:GEOFFREY D. DUKE, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of the…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: Aug 3, 2010

Citations

Case No. 3:09cv412/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Aug. 3, 2010)

Citing Cases

McFalls v. Colvin

Thus, Dr. Horvat is considered a "nontreating source." See 20 C.F.R. § 404.1502 (a nontreating source is a…